Deadly social media trend threatens kids, homeowners defending themselves: 'children are going to get killed'New Foto - Deadly social media trend threatens kids, homeowners defending themselves: 'children are going to get killed'

Potentiallydangerous social media trendsare getting kids, and potentially homeowners, into trouble this summer while kids are out of school. Two trends in particular are going viral onsocial media, including the "UrbanEx," or "urban exploration," challenge and the "door-kicking challenge." "There's a new trend every day. … You go to the FYP, the For You Page, you see what's trending. And then pretty soon, you'll see content created by children, which is in and of itself problematic. A lot of the children under the age of 13 … are legally not allowed to even be on social media," Titania Jordan, CMO and chief parent officer at Bark Technologies, a parental control app, told Fox News Digital. Social media challenges prompt users to create more "content that elicits a reaction," she explained, "that has viral components, resurfaces and resurfaces again, thanks again to the algorithm." Over Half Of Top 100 Mental Health Tiktok Videos Contain Misinformation: Report "This sort of content is going to get likes, it's going to get comments, it is going to get shares. It's going to encourage children to try to emulate it because it's clout — they gain clout from their peers because of this," she said. "…Any challenge like this, children aren't thinking, 'Is this the right thing to do? Is this safe?' They're thinking, 'I want validation,' and children are going to get killed. I mean, just one person who is armed who gets their door kicked in by a kid, and you're gonna have another national headline that is very sad." Read On The Fox News App Law enforcement agencies across the country are warning of both trends, the former of which challenges social media users to explore abandoned buildings and the latter of which challenges them to kick in strangers' doors. Texas Bill Pushes Strictest Social Media Ban For Minors In The Nation While the door-kicking challenge has existed for years, multiple agencies have issued recent warnings, indicating a possible uptick in the trend this summer. An Ohio police department recently warned about the challenge, saying it is investigating four incidents that occurred in Byesville. "Reports of doors being kicked in on homes began to come in during the middle of the night. Officers have collected evidence from neighborhoods indicating that a social media trend called the 'Door Kicking Challenge' is behind these acts," the Byesville Police Department said in a Facebook post. "The suspects are not entering the homes; instead, they are merely kicking the front doors and then fleeing the scene." Byesville police added that authorities are collecting physical evidence from the scenes of these crimes, including video footage. Byesville PD Chief Daulton Dolan told Fox News Digital that the door-kick challenges take "ding dong ditch" to a new level, especially in stand-your-ground states like Ohio. "If you feel that your life or a life of your family members are threatened, you can take deadly force against somebody right there on the spot. … So, for instance, if someone kicks open [a] door in the middle of the night, and the homeowner believes that they're coming in can physically harm them, they're going to shoot at them if they have a gun nearby," Dolan said. "And in Southeast Ohio … we've seen that before." Additionally, in Ohio, if a person's leg enters another person's home by kicking a door in, that can result in a burglary charge, on top of possibly trespassing charges, Dolan explained. Homeowners might also face a lengthy process in the criminal justice system if they choose to defend themselves with a gun if someone kicks their door open, Dolan said. "Our job would be: if the homeowner did fire a weapon if somebody had kicked open their door, we would conduct an investigation into that. Of course, we would seize the weapon that was used in it as evidence. We would take any kind of interviews and reports, medical exams, pictures, measurements, everything … and then we would turn it over to the Guernsey County Prosecutor's Office … [who] can rule it out as a justified homicide or they can move it up further and go to a grand jury." The Fleetwood Police Department in Pennsylvania on June 8 warned that a "TikTok 'door knock' or 'door kick' challenge encourages kids and teens to record themselves doing just that; knocking on and/or kicking random doors, usually late at night." "While 'ding dong ditch' has been a hallmark for decades of kids who were looking to have a little mischievous fun, today's youth have taken things to a more serious level by kicking at doors and ultimately causing damage," the department wrote. "Besides the financial consequences to homeowners who are often left with the expense of repairs, there is the potential for a child to be seriously hurt or even killed by someone who believes, especially in the middle of the night, that their residence is being broken into and ultimately determines there is an imminent threat to life and property." The Flower Mound Police Department and The Oak Harbor Police Department in Washington also said they have seen the trend on TikTok. 'Skinnytok' Weight-loss Trend Could Lead To Food Deprivation, Experts Caution The Fort Worth Police Department in Texas issued a similar warning recently. "This trend has been reported across the country, including right here in Texas," the Fort Worth PD said. "It is imperative that individuals partaking in this trend understand that even if no burglary or theft occur, this behavior is illegal and considered vandalism and can lead to criminal charges. More critically, it can be mistaken as an attempted break-in, potentially prompting dangerous or defensive responses from homeowners." Thedepartment further urged parents"to speak with their children about the risks and consequences of participating in trends like this," adding that "what may seem like a prank can result in very real trouble and/or danger." Meanwhile, another trend called "UrbanEx" has made headlines recently for putting participating social media users behind bars. The "challenge" encourages users to explore abandoned buildings, from old schools to churches to retail and entertainment establishments. The Harris County Constables in Precinct One in Texas recently announced the arrests of three 18-year-old men, who are accused of trespassing in the Houston Astrodome, which has been closed since 2009. The Constables office said security guards for the venue saw the three men enter the stadium around midnight and later spotted them running across a parking lot and jumping a fence. The three teens are charged with trespassing. "Sneaking into closed old historic buildings is dangerous," Constable Precinct One Alan Rosen said in a June 10 statement. "You are taking a risk for yourself and first responders, and it is against the law." A June 8 videoshowing the interior of the Astrodomeposted by Urbex.tx had nearly 845,000 views on TikTok. Child Safety Must Be Priority Of Tiktok Negotiations, Parents Group Urges Vp Vance Last year, a 23-year-old man named Guillermo Leflore, known as "Urbex Tarzan" on TikTok, was arrested after officials said he trespassed on private property while exploring steam tunnels. It wasn't his first time attempting a dangerous stunt for social media; he is accused of previously attempting to climb the Milwaukee Art Museum, asFOX 6 Milwaukeefirst reported. Ari Lightman, professor of digital media and marketing at Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College of Information Systems and Public Policy, told Fox News Digital that social media trends resemble what used to be games of truth-or-dare "on steroids." "You're reaching tens of thousands of people. You're not daring somebody face-to-face," Lightman said. "Why are they doing that? Is it just to get likes, and those likes might turn into followers, and those followers might turn into advertisers, and those advertisers might turn into profits for some people? Is it even real, or is it AI generated?" Defenders of the UrbanEx trend say it exposes historically significant structures that have been left to rot; many social media users have been calling on local city leaders to revive abandoned schools, houses, churches and event spaces. "Just the general lack of respect amongst children today, whether it's for people's property in the classroom or other people's feelings, it's a big problem. They're lacking empathy and respect because they're spending too much time in front of a screen and not enough understanding in real-life human emotion," Jordan said. She advised parents to join a Facebook group called "Parenting in a Tech World" where the "latest trends are being shared there from parents whose children are experiencing it in real time." She also advised parents to talk to their kids candidly and calmly about what they are seeing online, and Google the trends that are appearing on the social media pages. "Maybe your kid's playing Roblox and you don't think it's safe. Google dangers of Roblox. Show your child how other children have been harmed by adults they have been lured by on that platform so they realize you're not just being overprotective," she said. "All you can do is have candid calm conversations with them, and not just talking to them or talking at them, but asking them what they've seen. What did they think? What do they think the dangers are of hanging around an old building and recording it? Maybe they say they don't know, and that can encourage a conversation right there." Original article source:Deadly social media trend threatens kids, homeowners defending themselves: 'children are going to get killed'

Deadly social media trend threatens kids, homeowners defending themselves: 'children are going to get killed’

Deadly social media trend threatens kids, homeowners defending themselves: 'children are going to get killed' Potentiallydangerous s...
Pope Leo takes first action to address abuse by Catholic clergyNew Foto - Pope Leo takes first action to address abuse by Catholic clergy

By Joshua McElwee VATICAN CITY (Reuters) -Pope Leo on Saturday appointed a French archbishop as the new leader of the Vatican's commission on clergy sexual abuse, in the U.S. pontiff's first public move to confront an issue that has damaged the global Church's credibility. Thibault Verny, 59, will be president of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors while also remaining the archbishop of Chambery in southeast France. The Vatican commission was created by Pope Francis in 2014 in an effort by the late pontiff to respond after sexual abuse scandals affected the Church in countries across the world. The scandals have damaged the Church's standing as a moral voice, led to lawsuits costing millions in countries across the globe, and resulted in a number of resignations of bishops. Verny said he was committed to improving the Church's safeguarding measures. "We will promote the ... equitable sharing of resources so that all parts of the Church, regardless of geography or circumstance, can uphold the highest standards of protection," he said in a statement. Verny replaces Cardinal Sean O'Malley, the former archbishop of Boston. O'Malley, 81, had been serving beyond the Church's traditional retirement age of 80 for bishops. O'Malley had led the group since its creation. While some victims have praised the commission's efforts, it has also been roiled by the resignations of several of its members over the years. In 2023, a prominent Jesuit priest and papal adviser stepped down, saying publicly that he had concerns over the way the group was operating. Verny was first made a member of the commission by Francis in 2022. He has also led the French Church's safeguarding efforts. O'Malley praised the appointment, saying in a statement Verny is "a collaborative leader committed to advancing the global adoption of protection and safeguarding, to as best possible assure the safety of those in the care of the Church throughout the world". (Reporting by Joshua McElwee; Editing by Alison Williams)

Pope Leo takes first action to address abuse by Catholic clergy

Pope Leo takes first action to address abuse by Catholic clergy By Joshua McElwee VATICAN CITY (Reuters) -Pope Leo on Saturday appointed a ...
Oasis Live '25 setlist: All the songs on Britpop band's reunion tourNew Foto - Oasis Live '25 setlist: All the songs on Britpop band's reunion tour

It took 15 years, but Noel andLiam Gallahersidelined their acrimony to share a stage again. The long-awaitedOasis Live '25reunion tour kicked off July 4 at Cardiff Principality Stadium in Wales almost a year after the band announced, "This is it, this is happening." For two hours and 23 songs, fans of theBritpop superstarsreveled in hearing throwbacks spanning Oasis' illustrious seven-album history, from their 1994 debut, "Definitely Maybe," to 2008's "Dig Out Your Soul." Many songs played, including the opening "Hello," with a hoodie-clad Liam assuming his position with hands clasped behind his back and Noel slashing away at his guitar in his typical workman's shirt uniform, haven't been performed since 2002. Other fan favorites such as "Cigarettes & Alcohol," "Roll With It" and "Live Forever" brought grown men in the stadium crowd to tears, so happy were they to finally hear these songs again. The band anchored by the tempestuous Gallagher brothers split in 2009 when guitarist Noel said he could no longer work with singer Liam. Now, they're embarking on asold-out, 41-date stadium runthat will play throughout the U.K., North America, Asia, Australia and South America until November withband membersAndy Bell (bass), Gem Archer (guitar), Paul "Bonehead" Arthurs for the first time since 1998 (guitar) and newcomer to the band Joey Waronker (drums). The North American jaunt kicks off Aug. 24 in Toronto and will also hit Chicago, East Rutherford, New Jersey and Pasadena, California, withCage the Elephantopening all dates. Here are the songs Oasis played on opening night. "Hello" "Acquiesce" "Morning Glory" "Some Might Say" "Bring it On Down" Cigarettes & Alcohol" "Fade Away" "Supersonic" "Roll With It" "Talk Tonight" "Half the World Away" "Little By Little" "D'You Know What I Mean" "Stand By Me" "Cast No Shadow" "Slide Away" "Whatever" "Live Forever" "Rock 'n' Roll Star" "The Masterplan" "Don't Look Back in Anger" "Wonderwall" "Champagne Supernova" This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Oasis Live '25 setlist: All the songs on their reunion tour

Oasis Live '25 setlist: All the songs on Britpop band's reunion tour

Oasis Live '25 setlist: All the songs on Britpop band's reunion tour It took 15 years, but Noel andLiam Gallahersidelined their acri...
Julian McMahon, 'Fantastic Four,' 'Nip/Tuck' and 'FBI: Most Wanted' Star, Dies at 56New Foto - Julian McMahon, 'Fantastic Four,' 'Nip/Tuck' and 'FBI: Most Wanted' Star, Dies at 56

Julian McMahon, the suave Australian actor best known for his performances on "FBI: Most Wanted," "Charmed," "Nip/Tuck" and the early aughts "Fantastic Four" films, died Wednesday in Florida. He was 56 and died after a battle with cancer. His death was confirmed through the official "Nip/Tuck"Facebook page. The remembrance post read, "Warner Bros. Television mourns the loss of our friend Julian McMahon. Our thoughts are with his family, friends, colleagues, and fans." More from Variety How 'FBI: Most Wanted' Wrote Out Julian McMahon - and How Dylan McDermott Will Fit in Post-'Law & Order: Organized Crime' Dylan McDermott to Replace Julian McMahon as 'FBI: Most Wanted' Lead 'FBI: Most Wanted' Star Julian McMahon to Exit After Three Seasons "What shocking news," Dick Wolf, producer of "FBI: Most Wanted," said in a statement. "All of us at Wolf Entertainment are deeply saddened by Julian's passing and our condolences go out to his entire family." McMahon got his start on a string of Australian TV soaps, including "The Power, the Passion" and "Home and Away." He made his film debut playing a lifeguard in the 1992 comedy "Wet and Wild Summer," co-starring with Elliott Gould and Christopher Atkins. One of McMahon's first American TV jobs was a 22-episode arc on the NBC soap opera "Another World." He then landed a recurring role on another NBC program, "Profiler," before breaking out as Cole Turner on "Charmed." He starred in three seasons of the supernatural teen drama. McMahon's first major leading role in television was on Ryan Murphy's campy plastic surgery series "Nip/Tuck," which ran for six seasons on FX. He starred as Dr. Christian Troy, a womanizing and arrogant surgeon, who worked with Dylan Walsh's more milquetoast Dr. Sean McNamara. He earned a Golden Globe nomination for the role in 2005. Years after the FX series, McMahon's next major TV role was on "FBI: Most Wanted," where he played Jesse LaCroix, a supervisory special agent who mentored younger members of his team. He joined the series in 2020 and starred in 43 episodes before exiting in 2022. McMahon's other TV credits include "Full Circle," "Hunters," "Runaways" and "The Residence." McMahon's best-known film role was playing the villainous Doctor Doom in Tim Story's 2005 "Fantastic Four" and its 2007 sequel "Rise of the Silver Surfer." His other film credits include "Red," "Faces in the Crowd," "Paranoia," "Swinging Safari," "Monster Party," "The Surfer" and "The Supremes at Earl's All-You-Can-Eat." McMahon, born in Sydney, Australia on July 27, 1968, was the son of Billy McMahon, the Australian Prime Minister from 1971 to 1972. Best of Variety Oscars 2026: George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Roberts, Wagner Moura and More Among Early Contenders to Watch New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Sign up forVariety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us onFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram.

Julian McMahon, ‘Fantastic Four,’ ‘Nip/Tuck’ and ‘FBI: Most Wanted’ Star, Dies at 56

Julian McMahon, 'Fantastic Four,' 'Nip/Tuck' and 'FBI: Most Wanted' Star, Dies at 56 Julian McMahon, the suave Austr...
Human remains located after California fireworks warehouse explosionNew Foto - Human remains located after California fireworks warehouse explosion

Investigators have located human remains following an explosion at a Northern California fireworks warehouse, Yolo County said in a statement Friday. Seven were missing after the Tuesday fireworks explosion near Esparto, which gripped the small farming community. It sparked a massive fire that led to other spot fires. Nearby Fourth of July celebrations were called off. The county confirmed that its Coroner's Division was allowed access to the site of the fire incident, and the Coroner's Office has been in contact with the families of those who had been reported missing. No positive identifications have been made, and recovery efforts are still underway, the county said in the statement. Two people were treated for injuries according to officials. Authorities are still investigating the cause of the blast. The warehouse was managed by Devastating Pyrotechnics, which has more than three decades of experience designing and producing fireworks shows in the Bay Area, according to a screenshot of its website before it was taken down. The company, with headquarters in both San Francisco and Esparto, focuses mainly on display fireworks for big productions instead of those for retail. The company said in a statement it would cooperate fully with officials in their investigation. Further south in the state, authorities said that one man was found dead on the scene after a "fireworks-related blaze" ripped through four homes in a Los Angeles neighborhood Thursday night. A woman was taken to the hospital in critical condition, four others were given treatment for smoke inhalation on the scene and several animals were injured, the Los Angeles Fire Department said in a statement. Fireworks were still erupting in the area when firefighters arrived at the blaze, which they brought under control later that night, according to the Los Angeles Fire Department. The cause of the fire is still being investigated, department spokesperson Lyndsey Lantz said. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Human remains located after California fireworks warehouse explosion

Human remains located after California fireworks warehouse explosion Investigators have located human remains following an explosion at a No...
Why Roberts and Gorsuch may decide the Supreme Court's blockbuster transgender sports caseNew Foto - Why Roberts and Gorsuch may decide the Supreme Court's blockbuster transgender sports case

The Supreme Court's decision Thursday to weigh in ontransgender sports banswill put two conservative justices in the spotlight in coming months, both because of what they have said in past cases involving LGBTQ rights – and what they haven't. Only two justices have written majority opinions involving transgender Americans –Chief Justice John Robertsand Justice Neil Gorsuch – and both avoided revealing their thoughts about the sports cases last month when, in a blockbuster ruling, the Supreme Court upheldTennessee's ban on puberty blockersand hormone therapy for trans youth. For the second time in as many years the high court will wrestle with a heated legal dispute involving young transgender Americans at a time when they are facing severe political backlash driven in part by President Donald Trump and conservative states. The court agreed to hear appeals in two related cases challenging laws in West Virginia and Idaho that ban transgender girls and women from competing on women's sports teams – including one that was filed by a middle school student at the time. While the courtswerved around fundamental questions about trans rightsin last month's decision inUS v. Skrmetti, it will be far harder to do so in the sports cases. And that could put enormous focus on Roberts and Gorsuch. "Even though the court ruled against the transgender plaintiffs inSkrmetti, it did not decide the larger and more important question of whether discrimination based on transgender status triggers more searching judicial review," said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at Georgetown University Law Center. "Everything," Vladeck predicted, "is going to come down to where Roberts and Gorsuch are." In some ways, the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision on June 18 upholding Tennessee's ban on certain transgender care was limited. That opinion, written by Roberts, explicitly declined to decide if the law discriminated against transgender youth. Tennessee's policy, Roberts reasoned, instead drew boundaries based on age and medical procedures that were well within a state's power to regulate. That logic avoided thorny questions about whether the law violated the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause if it specifically targeted transgender minors for different treatment. Tennessee's law, Roberts wrote, "classifies on the basis of age" and "classifies on the basis of medical use." But it will be more difficult for the court to duck those broader questions in the sports cases, several experts said. "It is notable that the court seemed to go out of its way to avoid endorsing the idea that the law discriminated against transgender people and instead found that the Tennessee law had drawn lines based on age and medical diagnoses," said Suzanne Goldberg, a Columbia Law School professor and an expert on gender and sexuality law. "The new cases squarely present the discrimination questions in ways that will be hard to avoid," she said. "It's important," she said, "not to lose sight of the fact that these cases involve kids trying to make their way through school and life like every other kid." Gorsuch, who was Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, joined the majority opinion in the Tennessee case but did not write separately to explain his position. His silence was significant given that one of the key arguments at stake was how – or whether – to apply the landmark 2020 decision inBostock v. Clayton Countythat he authored. In that decision, the court ruled that transgender workers are covered by federal protections against discrimination based on sex because discrimination against a transgender person is, by extension, necessarily also discrimination based on sex. The Biden administration and transgender teenagers fighting Tennessee's law asserted that the same logic should apply when it comes to gender identity care bans. But the court has never extended its reasoning inBostockbeyond the workplace, and the decision drew immediate and sharp criticism from the right at the time. John Bursch, a veteran Supreme Court litigator and senior counsel at the conservative Alliance Defending Freedom, predicted that both Roberts and Gorsuch will ultimately back the state bans on transgender people participating in sports that align with their gender identity given their votes in the Tennessee dispute. "If they were in agreement that Tennessee's law did not discriminate based on gender identity, I would assume that both of them would come to the same conclusion here when it comes to sports," Bursch said. "But you never know for sure, and anytime that we go to the court, we assume that all nine justices are in play." Alliance Defending Freedom is a co-counsel in both sports cases the Supreme Court agreed to hear. "Our hope is that we would get a unanimous ruling to protect women's sports in favor of both West Virginia and Idaho in their laws," Bursch added. Other members of the court's six-justice conservative wing – including two who are often decisive votes – have more clearly signaled their thoughts on anti-trans laws. In the Tennessee case,Justice Amy Coney Barrettpenned a concurring opinion making clear that she opposed granting transgender status the same anti-discrimination protections that race and sex have under the 14th Amendment. She also was the only member of the court's majority that day to raise sports in an opinion. "Beyond the treatment of gender dysphoria, transgender status implicates several other areas of legitimate regulatory policy – ranging from access to restrooms to eligibility for boys' and girls' sports teams," Barrett wrote in an opinion joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. "If laws that classify based on transgender status necessarily trigger heightened scrutiny, then the courts will inevitably be in the business of 'closely scrutiniz(ing) legislative choices' in all these domains." Justice Samuel Alito wrote a concurrence arguing against extending Bostock's reasoning to constitutional cases. During oral arguments over Tennessee's law in December, Justice Brett Kavanaugh – another justice who is sometimes seen as a swing vote – mentioned sports as hepeppered the lawyerfor the Biden administration with skeptical questions about her position. "If you prevail here," asked Kavanaugh, who has frequently noted that he coached his daughters' basketball teams, "what would that mean for women's and girls' sports in particular?" "Would transgender athletes have a constitutional right, as you see it, to play in women's and girls' sports, basketball, swimming, volleyball, track, et cetera, notwithstanding the competitive fairness and safety issues that have been vocally raised by some female athletes?" Kavanaugh pressed. In response, then-Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar attempted to distinguish the sports cases from Tennessee's law. She noted that some lower courts had already held that the sports bans triggered a higher level of judicial scrutiny. Kavanaugh also dissented from Gorsuch's decision inBostock. The court's three liberals dissented in the Tennessee case, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing that the majority had pulled back from "meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most" and instead "abandons transgender children and their families to political whims." In the West Virginia case, then Gov. Jim Justice, a Republican, signed the "Save Women's Sports Act" in 2021, banning transgender women and girls from participating on public school sports teams consistent with their gender identity. Becky Pepper-Jackson, a rising sixth grader at the time, who was "looking forward to trying out for the girls' cross-country team," filed a lawsuit alleging that the ban violated federal law and the Constitution. The Richmond-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appealsruled last yearthat West Virginia's ban violated Pepper-Jackson's rights under Title IX, a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex at schools that receive federal aid. The court also revived her constitutional challenge of the law. Two years ago, the Supreme Court denied West Virginia's emergency docket request to let it fully enforce its ban. Alito and Thomas dissented from that decision, though the focus of their objection was that neither the Supreme Court nor the 4th Circuit had offered an explanation for their decisions. In Idaho, Republican Gov. Brad Little signed the state's sports ban in 2020. Lindsay Hecox, then a freshman at Boise State University, sued days later, saying that she intended to try out for the women's track and cross-country teams and alleging the law violated the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. A federal district court blocked the law's enforcement against Hecox months later and the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision last year. Idaho appealed to the Supreme Court in July. State officials in West Virginia and Idaho praised the court's decision to take up the cases. "Idaho was the first state to step out and ban boys and men from competing with girls and women in organized athletics," Little said on Thursday, describing the law as a "common sense"policy intended to "protect the American way of life." Lawyers for the transgender athletes described the laws as discriminatory and harmful. The Supreme Court will likely hear arguments in the cases later this year or in early 2026 and is expected to hand down a decision by the end of June. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Why Roberts and Gorsuch may decide the Supreme Court’s blockbuster transgender sports case

Why Roberts and Gorsuch may decide the Supreme Court's blockbuster transgender sports case The Supreme Court's decision Thursday to ...
Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis Spend 10th Wedding Anniversary on Sunny Italian GetawayNew Foto - Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis Spend 10th Wedding Anniversary on Sunny Italian Getaway

COBRA TEAM / BACKGRID (2) Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis celebrated their 10th wedding anniversary in Italy on July 4 The couple were seen boarding a yacht together in coordinating outfits TheThat '70s Showcostars share two kids, 10 and 8 years old Ashton KutcherandMila Kunisare celebrating a decade of marriage abroad. The pair were photographed stepping aboard a yacht on Thursday, July 3, in Venice, Italy, while on a vacation surrounding their 10-year wedding anniversary. Kutcher, 47, wore a blue-and-white patterned shirt paired with khaki shorts, while Kunis, 41, wore a blue-and-white floral patterned dress and flip flops. The couple married on July 4, 2015,in a ceremony held at the Secret Garden at Parrish Ranch in Oak Glen, Calif. The couple's relationship first began in 2012, years after they met as costars on the set ofThat '70s Showin 1998. COBRA TEAM / BACKGRID Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The couple share daughter Wyatt, 10, and son Dimitri, 8. Kutcher and Kunis have previously been open about their desire to keep their children's lives private. COBRA TEAM / BACKGRID "We don't share any photosof our kids publicly because we feel that being public is a personal choice,"The Ranchactor said in a 2017 interview withThrive Global Podcast with iHeartRadio."My wife and I have chosen a career where we're in the public light, but my kids have not so I think they have the right to choose that." On theWTF with Marc Maronpodcast in 2018, Kunis said there were "no feelings whatsoever" between them during their time makingThat '70s Showtogether. "It's the weirdest story that nobody believes, but it's the God's honest truth," theLuckiest Girl Aliveactress said. "You know, he and I talk about it and we're like, 'God.' " Araya Doheny/Getty Images "Had we connected [in the past] would we have connected? No," she continued. "The people that we were back then would never be together. But it's just such a bummer that we missed out on 20 years together. I look back and I think, 'We could have spent 20 years together.' " Read the original article onPeople

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis Spend 10th Wedding Anniversary on Sunny Italian Getaway

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis Spend 10th Wedding Anniversary on Sunny Italian Getaway COBRA TEAM / BACKGRID (2) Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kuni...

 

MARIO MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com