Lone wolf attacks in Boulder and D.C. highlight the difficulties in securing public spacesNew Foto - Lone wolf attacks in Boulder and D.C. highlight the difficulties in securing public spaces

BOULDER, Colo. — Once again, the war in Gaza has come home to America. A man using what police called a "makeshift flamethrower" launched a gruesome attack on demonstrators in Boulder on Sunday, raising questions about why security wasn't stronger in the wake of an earlier attack in Washington, D.C. Run for Their Lives, the organization behind the long-standing demonstration that advocated for the return of Israeli hostages, had anticipated that its members would have safety concerns. The group offered principles to make the events safer, including "don't protest," "be polite and peaceful" and "don't disturb your neighbors." "Focus on humanity,"the guidance on its websitesays. "This is about innocent children, women, the elderly, and other civilians being held by terrorists—not about the war." The Boulder chapter of Run for Their Lives has been holding regular demonstrations demanding that Hamas release the hostages seized during theterrorist attack on Israelon Oct. 7, 2023. Kyle and Elizabeth Shorter, who live in a Denver suburb and were taking their wedding pictures in Boulder when the attack happened, said the Run for Their Lives demonstrators had become fixtures on the street. "Every time we've come up here the past couple of years, they've always been here," said Elizabeth Shorter, 26. "They've never been aggressive or chanting, just simply walking." And that, an expert said, could make them harder to protect from a terrorist. "Usually, there is a regular detail assigned to protect protesters," said Brian Higgins, who teaches at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City and runs a security consulting firm calledGroup 77. "But it's not uncommon for a mindset to set in that, as time goes on and nothing out of the ordinary happens, that there's no need to be on high alert." Higgins, who said he wasn't aware of what security measures Boulder police had in place Sunday, was taken aback by video that showed the attacker threatening people before police intervened. "That shouldn't have happened," Higgins said. "That raises questions for me about how much security there was at this protest." Police Chief Stephen Redfearn said his department is aware of events taking place later in the month and will plan to provide additional security coverage. "We want to ensure that people feel comfortable and safe in this community," he told reporters on Monday. Shira Weiss, global coordinator for Run for Their Lives, said that some chapters have long relied on protection from local police or private security but that it's "really the individual group leader's decision how and when they want to use security." And while some local chapters have paused to "recompose themselves and give themselves space to heal" after the Boulder attack, others have said, "We won't stop; we're going to be right back out there next week," Weiss said. "We obviously keep reiterating to our group leaders that safety is the No. 1 priority," she said. Although clearly frightened by what she witnessed, attack survivor Lisa Turnquist, 66, said she won't be deterred from speaking out against Hamas and on behalf of the Israeli hostages. "This is when we have to get up and we have to stand out and push back," said Turnquist, who spoke to a reporter outside the historic Boulder County Courthouse, where the attack happened. "We just want the hostages home." A dozen people were injured Sunday, eight of whom remain hospitalized, authorities said. Initial calls to police reported people "being set on fire," and officers found multiple victims with burns and other injuries, Boulder's police chief told reporters. Egyptian national Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, has been charged with attempted murder and a hate crime, among other offenses. The attack happened just 11 days after two Israeli Embassy workers were gunned down outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington. In both the Boulder and the Washington attacks, the attackers are alleged to have yelled the same thing: "Free Palestine." Security experts who spoke with NBC News questioned how the man in Boulder was able to allegedly launch such an attack downtown even amid heightened awareness after the Washington killings. Higgins said his security clients include several major Jewish organizations. And ever since the killings of Israeli Embassy workers Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim on May 22, they have been adding extra layers of security, he said. "Given what's going on out there and the agitation out there, my recommendation is that there should be an elevated level of security at all Gaza protests," Higgins said. Run for Their Lives has been holding regular demonstrations outside the county courthouse on Pearl Street since Hamas launched a bloody surprise attack on Israel and took 250 hostages. That spawned an Israeli invasion of Gaza that has left more than 54,000 people dead, many of them women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Michael Alcazar, a former hostage negotiator with the New York Police Department who also teaches at John Jay, said Pearl Street is a soft target for a terrorist attack. He said the attacker was able to approach the demonstrators because they didn't appear to be protected. "The police chief dropped the ball not having a uniform presence over there," Alcazar said. "Is the police chief not aware of what's going in the world?" The Boulder Police Department didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. The Anti-Defamation League said it had been in contact with local law enforcement in Boulder. "We feel at ADL like many across the country feel, which is just vulnerability and both sadness and anger at the violence that we've seen," said Oren Segal, the Anti-Defamation League's senior vice president for counterextremism and intelligence. "This is a wake-up call — not just for the Jewish community." The FBI also said in a statement that "our goal is always to get ahead of any threats." "We have long warned that lone actors or small groups of conspirators present a great challenge to law enforcement because there may not be a lot of clues about their intentions," it said. An affidavit alleged that Soliman, a married father of five, had been planning the attack for over a year and was waiting for one of his daughters to graduate before he set his alleged plan into motion. It didn't specify where his daughter was graduating from. Soliman told investigators during his arrest interview that he researched how to make Molotov cocktails on YouTube, according to the affidavit. It alleged that he was also unrepentant about the attack, saying he would do it again to stop Israel from taking over "our land," referring to the Palestinian territories. Elias Rodriguez, the Chicagoan charged with the deaths of Lischinsky and Milgrim, was also motivated by the Gaza war, authorities said. He told police when he was arrested, "I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza," according to court records and published reports. In his first comments since the attack, President Donald Trump condemned the "horrific" incident Monday on Truth Social. Earlier, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller sought to shift blame onto the Biden administration for allowing Soliman in the country. "He was granted a tourist visa by the Biden Administration and then he illegally overstayed that visa," Millersaid Sunday on X. "In response, the Biden Administration gave him a work permit." Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, amplified that on X, saying that Soliman "is illegally in our country" and that he applied for asylum in September 2022. McLaughlin later told NBC News that Soliman's asylum claim was pending and that while his visa had expired, he hadn't yet exhausted all legal routes to stay in the United States. Deon J. Hampton reported from Boulder, Alicia Victoria Lozano reported from Los Angeles and Elizabeth Chuck and Corky Siemaszko from New York City.

Lone wolf attacks in Boulder and D.C. highlight the difficulties in securing public spaces

Lone wolf attacks in Boulder and D.C. highlight the difficulties in securing public spaces BOULDER, Colo. — Once again, the war in Gaza has ...
Harvard seeks end to US funding cuts, says national security, public health research in perilNew Foto - Harvard seeks end to US funding cuts, says national security, public health research in peril

By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -Harvard University asked a federal judge on Monday to issue a summary judgment ruling to unfreeze $2.5 billion in funding blocked by President Donald Trump's administration, which Harvard said was illegal. Harvard's filing in the U.S. District Court in Boston said that it had received 957 orders since April 14 to freeze funding for research pertaining to national security threats, cancer and infectious diseases and more since the country's oldest and wealthiest school rejected a White House list of demands. Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because in his view they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs has set arguments for July 21 on Harvard's motion for summary judgment, which is a request for a judge to decide a dispute without a trial to determine material facts. Harvard sued the Trump administration in April, alleging the funding freeze violated the school's right to free speech and was arbitrary and capricious. In Monday's court filing, Harvard detailed the terminated grants, including $88 million for research into pediatric HIV, $12 million for increasing Defense Department awareness of emerging biological threats and $8 million to better understand dark energy. The school said ending the funding would destroy ongoing research into cancer treatments, infectious disease and Parkinson's. The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza. Other investigations are probing whether Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students. The Trump administration revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students last month, which a judge temporarily blocked after Harvard sued in a separate case. Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech and freedom of academics, as well as threats to the schools' very existence. (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

Harvard seeks end to US funding cuts, says national security, public health research in peril

Harvard seeks end to US funding cuts, says national security, public health research in peril By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -H...
A guide to 'Love Island' in 2025: How to watch U.K. and U.S. versions, where to stream past seasons and moreNew Foto - A guide to 'Love Island' in 2025: How to watch U.K. and U.S. versions, where to stream past seasons and more

The weather isn't the only thing that's about to start heating up. It's notjustalmost summer time — it's almostLove Islandtime! The steamy reality series that started in the U.K. has become a global phenomenon, with sexy singles from across the world signing up for aseason at the villa.Love Island U.K., the show that started it all, isback with Series 12— or Season 12 for U.S. fans — next Monday, June 9. But first,Love Island USAwill make a splash starting Tuesday, June 3. Are you ready to dive into the notoriously prolific reality series? There will be new episodes up to six nights a week this summer (seven if you're tuning into both versions of the series), so get ready to start streaming. Here's your ultimate guide on how to watchLove Islandin summer 2025. Love Islandkicks off in summer 2025 with the U.S. version first.Love Island USAstarts airing Tuesday, June 3 at 9 p.m. ET on Peacock. Series 12 of the original U.K. series will air the following Monday, June 9. Unlike its U.K. counterpart, which is broadcast on ITV2 and streamslive on ITVX(and typically on a week-long delay on Hulu for those in the U.S.)Love Island USAstreams exclusively on Peacock. You can find all past seasons of the U.S. spinoff also streaming on ITVX in the U.K. (or with thehelp of a VPN). Love Island USAis a spinoff of the hit U.K. reality show. The main difference — beyond hosts, contestants and the amount of prize money the winning couple is awarded — is which accents you'd like to hear as contestants get theirchaton around the bonfire at the villa. Vanderpump RulesStar Ariana Madix will return this year to hostLove Island USA.In the U.K.,Maya Jamais back for Series 12 ofLove Island. ForLove Island USA, new episodes will drop six days a week on Peacock starting June 3. Last season had 36 episodes over a six-week period, and this season is expected to follow the same format. The U.K. series typically lasts eight weeks, but ITV has yet to confirm the exact duration of the show this season. You can stream every season ofLove Island,Love Island All Stars,Love Island Aftersun,Love Island Games, Love Island Australiaand all theLove Islandreunions free on ITVX in the U.K. If you're watching fromoutside of the U.K., you'll need the help of a VPN. You can also catch all ofLove Island USAin the U.K. on ITVX. So if you don't want to pay for Peacock or Hulu, and you definitely want to watch the U.K. series, a VPN plus a free ITVX account may be your best (and cheapest) option.

A guide to 'Love Island' in 2025: How to watch U.K. and U.S. versions, where to stream past seasons and more

A guide to 'Love Island' in 2025: How to watch U.K. and U.S. versions, where to stream past seasons and more The weather isn't t...
Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference?New Foto - Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference?

NEW YORK ―Video evidenceshowsSean "Diddy" Combskicking and dragging his ex-girlfriend in a hotel hallway as she was trying to leave. But some defense lawyers still believe there's a way Combs could win hissex-trafficking trial: Admit you committed domestic violence, but remind jurors you're not charged with that crime. "The defense should be they've overcharged the guy. They're charging him with sex trafficking, when they should have charged him with domestic violence," lawyer and trial consultant Robert Hirschhorn tells USA TODAY ahead of the trial. Sure enough, Combs' defense lawyer Teny Geragossaid in her opening statementthat her team didn't plan to deny Combs' personal responsibility for domestic violence, but did plan to vigorously fight the trafficking charges. "Domestic violence is not sex trafficking," Geragos said. "I want to say it again. Domestic violence is not sex trafficking." Since the onset of the trial on May 5, Combs' defense team has tried to establish that people who participated in "freak offs" – in which Combs would, according to testimony, direct and sometimes film sex performances between women and male sex workers – did so willingly. That includes presenting texts to suggestCasandra "Cassie" Ventura Fine, the ex-girlfriend Combs assaulted in the hotel video, consented to "freak offs." "I don't want to freak off for our last time. I want it to be the first time for the rest of our lives," Ventura Finetexted Combs in 2012, according to a message his defense has shown to jurors. (The prosecution has shown jurors a different part of the same exchange in which Ventura Fine texted, "I don't wanna do one last time. I don't want to at all.") The strategy may be the best way for Combs to deal with video evidence and testimony from numerous witnesses on domestic violence. But the approach is also akin to threading a needle, according to some litigators who have prosecuted sex-trafficking cases. That's because sex trafficking involves compelling someone to participate in a commercial sex act through force, fraud, or coercion. If Combs admits he used physical violence in his relationship with Ventura Fine, some jurors could believe he's admitting he forced her into the "freak offs." "Domestic violence goes to the heart of that question," says Moira Penza, a litigator who in 2019 successfully prosecuted the so-calledNXIVM "sex cult"leaderKeith Ranierefor sex trafficking and racketeering – two charges Combs now faces. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges in the federal criminal trial. "If somebody is being beaten before or after sexual encounters, and knows that that is just a consistent part of their relationship, that really extinguishes any concept of consent and goes right to this element of, 'Was the commercial sex compelled through force, fraud or coercion?'" Penza tells USA TODAY. Combs' defense team didn't respond to a request for comment on whether it believes it is walking a tightrope in conceding domestic violence while denying he trafficked anyone. But it has tried to demonstrate that alleged victims had agency. "They're giving the jury an option that falls below sex trafficking, but still allows them to condemn Mr. Combs for his use of force that they know the government has evidence of," Hugh Sandler, a lawyer who has litigated human trafficking and racketeering, tells USA TODAY. It's possible the defense team didn't think it had any choice but to admit Combs abused Ventura Fine. In about a month, the jury has seenmyriad photos of injuriesVentura Fine says she suffered at Combs' hands and heard numerous witnesses testify that they personally witnessed Combs physically attack her. Combs' former stylistDeonte Nash, for instance, testified that Combs once threw Ventura Fine's head against a bed frame, causing a gash above her eye. Ventura Fine's former best friend,Kerry Morgan, said she saw Combs drag Ventura Fine down a 50-yard hallway before pushing her down, where she hit her head on a brick. Daniel Phillip, a male stripper who said he was paid for sex acts involving Combs and Ventura Fine, testified that he witnessed Combsthrow a liquor bottle in Ventura Fine's directionand drag her by her hair into a bedroom after she asked him to "hold on one second" when he called for her. The defense could still win an acquittal or a hung jury on the sex trafficking charges by distinguishing between domestic violence and sex trafficking, according to Mitchell Epner, a former New Jersey federal prosecutor who was the lead attorney in sex-trafficking and involuntary-servitude cases. "But it is really putting the jurors to the test of their oath to ask them to split hairs in the way that the defense is asking them to," Epner says. Litigators will tell you that trust with jurors can make or break a trial. The desire to win that trust may have driven the defense team's decision to admit guilt – just not to the charges. His lawyers knew going into the trial that jurors would hear graphic testimony of violence and "freak offs" that Ventura Fine says were only for Combs' pleasure. At one "freak off," Ventura Fine described, Combs directed an escort to urinate on her to the point that she was choking. "I thought that it was obvious that I didn't want to do it," she testified. "The most important thing you have as a trial lawyer is your credibility," Penza says. "I thought that the defense did as strong a job as you can given the facts that they have stacked against them." But even if the defense strategy was logical, that doesn't mean it's not risky. The prosecution already called one expert witness to the stand, clinical psychologistDawn Hughes, who described domestic violence as behavior that functions to exert control over a victim. "When we are hit, harmed, beat up … we feel scared," Hughes said. In eliciting that testimony, prosecutors may have wanted to link Combs' violent behavior with the ultimate charge: that he used that violence to compel Ventura Fine and others to participate in "freak offs." Having admitted to one part of that prosecution narrative, the defense is now tasked with severing its link to the wider charges. Can it thread that needle? Epner thinks it's possible, but also an uphill battle. "It may be asking too much of jurors to ask them to conclude that yes, Sean Combs is a drug-addicted, violent, sexual aggressor, but he didn't commit this offense because here there was consent," Epner says. Aysha Bagchi covers the Department of Justice for USA TODAY. She is an attorney, Harvard Law graduate, and Rhodes Scholar.You can follow her on X and Bluesky at @AyshaBagchi. If you are a survivor of sexual assault,RAINNoffers support through the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800.656.HOPE (4673) andHotline.RAINN.organd en EspañolRAINN.org/es. If you or someone you know is a victim of domestic violence, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or text "START" to 88788. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Diddy trial defense is tricky. Will jury see sex trafficking?

Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference?

Diddy team admits to violence, but not sex trafficking. Will the jury see a difference? NEW YORK ―Video evidenceshowsSean "Diddy" ...
Social security employees warn of delays: What the new priorities means for your benefitsNew Foto - Social security employees warn of delays: What the new priorities means for your benefits

If you need to update Social Securityaboutonarecentmove or bank account change, get in line. It could be a while. SuchcChangeslike these mayare likely totake longer,and thousands of Americans could see delays or even stopped checks in the meantime, Social Security employees warned USA TODAY. That's because Social Security officials have tweaked what they want some employees to treat as a priority for at least the next month to include about 900,000 complicated cases that must be completed by hand. While the White House says the additional work won't affect other beneficiaries, employees tell USA TODAY that adding something new and complicated at the top of their daily to do lists means other work doesn't get done. Some of the work that they expect to fall through the cracks ‒ like changing direct deposit information or fixing problems with Medicaid billing ‒ could mean the difference between receiving a check or not, they said. Social Security Administration employees at processing centers generally prioritize new claims and appeals each day. In late May, employees at many of the nation's eight processing centers were told to putSocial Security Fairness Act paymentsat the top of their work list and were offered weekend overtime to get it done. More:Public workers waited 40 years for law to boost Social Security. Now, they wait for payout Early this year,former President Joe Bidensigned into law the Social Security Fairness Act that will boost benefits to public servants like former teachers or postal workers, to account for money they paid into Social Security for their summer or off-hour private sector jobs but weren't fully paid under previous law. The agency initially set a November deadline to process over 3.2 million Fairness Act claims. New Social Security commissioner Frank Bisignano told senators during his March confirmation hearing that he will prioritize those payments and the work will be done "while the weather is warm." "Using automation, SSA has already expedited over $15.1 billion in long-delayed retroactive payments to more than 2.3 million individuals affected," White House spokesperson Liz Huston said. The agency is prioritizing the remaining about 900,000 cases that are too complex to be processed through automation. These cases require additional time to manually update the records and pay both retroactive benefits and the new benefits amount. Huston said the agency won't let other needs fall behind. "This project is very important to leadership and it's critical the agency executes it swiftly, efficiently, and without letting anything else fall through the cracks," Huston said. But months of upheaval at the Social Security Administration, which distributes retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to more than 70 million Americans of all ages, hasspooked manywho rely on money provided by the agency for either day-to-day help or for security in their retirement. Thousands of employees have accepted early buyout offers, interim leaders have changed what identification can be used and modification to technology behind the scenes caused multiple website failures. The turmoil led toincreased wait timeson the phone and extended waits to schedule in-person appointments at field offices. A half-dozen employees at several of the nation's Social Security processing centers said they were told that the new commissioner wants all of the Social Security Fairness Act claims resolved by July 1, and that they also need to address a backlog of claims that has built up. Several of the processing center employees who spoke to USA TODAY said they are afraid of retribution for speaking to the media. Multiple Social Security employees said the orders were relayed verbally, rather than in a written directive, which they said is unusual. Normally an edict to change priorities would have come by email so everyone received the same information, one employee said. One employee at a processing center on the East Coast shared a Teams message from their manager with USA TODAY that stated they should only assist if the call is related a new claim, an appeal or a Social Security Fairness Act case "until our workload focus is lifted." The message states they currently expect that order to end July 1, and instructs the employee to inform callers that they cannot help with other issues until then. More:Social Security wait times were already long under Biden. They're even longer under Trump. Employees who received the order said they were told they cannot help with non-priority issues like overpayment reconsideration, updating direct deposit information, checking on monthly payment rates, and Medicare billing related issues. An employee at a processing center on the West Coast told USA TODAY that processing new claims has always been the agency's top priority, but that adding the Social Security Fairness Act claims as a must-do item will cause delays in resolving more complicated and time consuming problems. The East Coast employee said he's having to tell caller after caller that he cannot address their Social Security-related need for the next month, which results in both him and his manager being yelled at all day. Employees working at some processing centers have been offered overtime to work Saturdays and Sundays for the next five weeks in order to ensure they complete their priority assignments and possibly complete other work, the employees said. Some who offered to work the overtime were told they could be allowed to work the overtime from home. Another employee in a separate East Coast processing center said they agreed to work several hours on Saturday for time and a half pay. They spent a day in late May processing only new claims and Social Security Fairness Act cases, which their manager said would continue through the end of June. The employee said they normally spend about 6 hours of each work day on issues like problems with Medicaid payments, death underpayments or when disability benefits and retirement benefits are accidentally paid at the same time. Those will not get done, the employee said. We want to hear from people affected by or who have inside knowledge of the Trump administration's efforts to reshape the government, including actions by DOGE. Know something others should? Reach out atswire@usatoday.comor Signal at sarahdwire.71 This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Social Security workers warn of delayed benefits as focus shifts

Social security employees warn of delays: What the new priorities means for your benefits

Social security employees warn of delays: What the new priorities means for your benefits If you need to update Social Securityaboutonarecen...
Israeli forces in Gaza kill 27 Palestinians seeking aid, health officials sayNew Foto - Israeli forces in Gaza kill 27 Palestinians seeking aid, health officials say

More than two dozen people were killed early Tuesday byIsraeli fireas they tried to reachaidinGaza, local health officials said, following the latest in astring of incidentssurrounding a controversial new aid distribution system in the enclave. The Hamas-run Palestinian health ministry in Gaza said Tuesday morning that at least 27 people were killed, with dozens injured, as they waited for aid at a designated site in the area of what is known as the "Al-Alam" roundabout in the southern city of Rafah. TheIsraeli militarysaid its troops had fired what it described as "warning fire" at a number of people about half a kilometer, or 0.3 miles, away from an aid distribution site — and that it was aware of reports of casualties and was looking into the matter. The Israel Defense Forces said troops had identified several people moving toward them "in such a way that posed a threat to them" and appearing to deviate from designated aid access routes, but did not expand on what threat those people posed. "After the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced toward the troops," it said. The incident is the latest in a string of similar events in which health officials and humanitarian groups say Palestinians have been killed whileseeking aid under a new distribution systemthat has been condemned by humanitarian groups that include aid-related bodies of the United Nations. It comes after Gaza health officials reported Monday that at least three people were killed and dozens injured when Israeli forces opened fire as people made their way toward a food distribution site, Reuters reported. The Israeli military said it was aware of reports of casualties and that the incident was being looked into, Reuters added. That, in turn, came a day aftermore than 30 people were killed in a similar event Sunday,with hundreds also injured according to local health officials and aid workers. Witnesses described coming under fire while waiting for aid and attempting to reach a distribution site to NBC News' crew on the ground. The Israeli military vigorously denied those reports, as didthe Gaza Humanitarian Foundation — the U.S. and Israel-backed organization has been tasked with distributing aid in the enclave. Following Sunday's incident, an Israeli military official told NBC News that soldiers fired warning shots "toward several suspects" about a half-mile from an aid distribution center, but they maintained that there was no connection between this and what they described as "false claims" made against the military. In a statement issued Monday, the GHF maintained "there were no injuries, fatalities or incidents" during their operations Sunday. "We have yet to see any concrete evidence that there was an attack at or near our facility yesterday and that evidence-based reporting should be at least the minimum requirement for news outlets," GHF said. In its statement on Tuesday's incident, the IDF said it allowed GHF to operate independently in order to enable the distribution of aid to Palestinian residents in Gaza "and not to Hamas," repeating a claim of Hamas diverting aid from civilians that Israeli officials have cited as being a key reason for introducing the new system — as well as for its 11-week aid blockade that it lifted last month. Aid groups, including the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, have previously told NBC News that they have not seen instances of aid being diverted to Hamas during the war in Gaza.

Israeli forces in Gaza kill 27 Palestinians seeking aid, health officials say

Israeli forces in Gaza kill 27 Palestinians seeking aid, health officials say More than two dozen people were killed early Tuesday byIsraeli...
NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for June 3New Foto - NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for June 3

NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for June 3originally appeared onParade. Get excited—there's another New York Times game to add to your daily routine! Those of us word game addicts who already playWordle,Connections,Strandsand theMini Crosswordnow have Connections Sports Edition to add to the mix.So, if you're looking for some hints and answers for today's Connections Sports Edition on Tuesday, June 3, 2025, you've come to the right place.Related:The 26 Funniest NYT Connections Game Memes You'll Appreciate if You Do This Daily Word Puzzle Connections Sports Edition is just like the regular Connections word puzzle, in that it's a game that resets at 12 a.m. EST each day and has 16 different words listed. It's up to you to figure out each group of four words that belong to a certain category, with four categories in total.This new version is sports-specific, however, as a partnership between The New York Times and The Athletic.As the NYT site instructs, for Connections Sports Edition, you "group sports terms that share a common thread." Here are some hints about the four categories to help you figure out the word groupings. Yellow:Mentally sharp or gifted. Green:When players (or assets) are exchanged. Blue:Athletes with the same first name. Purple:Malonga could be included here. OK, time for a second hint…we'll give you the actual categories now. Spoilers below! Yellow:SHREWD Green:TRANSACTION Blue:FAMOUS ATHLETES NAMED MARCUS Purple:WNBA ROOKIES If you're looking for the answers, no worries—we've got them below. So, don't scroll any further if you don't want to see the solutions!The answers to today's Connections Sports Edition #253 are coming up next.Related:15 Fun Games Like Connections to Play Every Day SHREWD: CANNY, CLEVER, CRAFTY, SAVVY TRANSACTION: DEAL, SWAP, TRADE, TRANSFER FAMOUS ATHLETES NAMED MARCUS: ALLEN, RASHFORD, SMART, STROMAN WNBA ROOKIES: BUECKERS, CITRON, IRIAFEN, RIVERS Don't worry if you didn't get them this time—we've all been there.Up next,catch up on the answers to recent Wordle puzzles. NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for June 3first appeared on Parade on Jun 3, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.

NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for June 3

NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for June 3 NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for June 3origina...

 

MARIO MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com