Ozzy Osbourne Announces New Book "Last Rites"

Ilya S. Savenok/Getty; grand central publishing On the heels of his final performance, Ozzy Osborne announced his memoir,Last Rites The legendary singer's firsthand account will explore his "descent into hell" — his medical crisis that caused him to end his tour in 2018 — and reflections on his life and career Last Riteswill be available Oct. 7, 2025 Ozzy Osborneis telling all in a new memoir. The legendary musician, 76, chronicled his long career, glittery public life and medical trouble that began seven years ago in his upcoming memoir, titledLast Rites.Published by Grand Central Publishing of Hachette Book Group, Osborne's firsthand account is "shocking, bitterly hilarious and surprisingly life-affirming." Osborne, the famed lead singer of Black Sabbath and the "Prince of Darkness," was on his farewell tour in 2018 when he contracted aninfectionon his thumb. The small ailment was quickly overshadowed by "near total paralysis from the neck down," the book's synopsis reads, which led Osborne to abandon his tour. The singer was later diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in 2019. From there, Osborne's story follows his "descent into hell." But, the singer wrote, he has no regrets at all. Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty "People say to me, if you could do it all again, knowing what you know now, would you change anything? I'm like, f*** no," the singer shared. "If I'd been clean and sober, I wouldn't be Ozzy. If I'd done normal, sensible things, I wouldn't be Ozzy." He continued, "Look, if it ends tomorrow, I can't complain. I've been all around the world. Seen a lot of things. I've done good... and I've done bad. But right now, I'm not ready to go anywhere." Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. grand central publishing The memoir includes Osborne's reflections on his life and career, including the Black Sabbath reunion and his close connections with other musicians Slash, Zakk Wylde and Lemmy Kilmister. Osborne recently performed hisfinal concerton July 5 at the "Back to the Beginning" show, which featured one last Black Sabbath reunion with guitarist Tony Iommi, bassist Geezer Butler and drummer Bill Ward. Last Riteswill be available Oct. 7, 2025, wherever books are sold. Read the original article onPeople

Ozzy Osbourne Announces New Book “Last Rites”

Ozzy Osbourne Announces New Book "Last Rites" Ilya S. Savenok/Getty; grand central publishing On the heels of his final performanc...
Justin Bieber Reveals New Album TracklistNew Foto - Justin Bieber Reveals New Album Tracklist

Justin Bieber has revealed the tracklist for what appears to be his seventh album "Swag," reportedly releasing on Friday. The pop singer started ramping up for the new record early Thursday morning, as fans noticed billboards around the world showing a photo of Bieber with the word "Swag" accompanying it. One billboard popped up in Reykjavik, Iceland, where Bieber had visited earlier this year. Soon after, Bieber posted a video taken in New York City's Times Square depicting a Billboard with the alleged tracklist. More from Variety Justin and Hailey Bieber Reveal They're Expecting Their First Child Usher Reveals Why Justin Bieber Declined Super Bowl Halftime Show Invitation Justin Bieber, Tate McRae, Michael Buble Co-Captain Teams - and Two Perform - During NHL All-Star Weekend The album is apparently arriving on Friday per theHollywood Reporter, who states that the record will feature appearances from Gunna, Sexyy Red and Cash Cobain. The publication reported that Bieber has been hosting jam sessions at his Los Angeles home this year with appearances from Carter Lang, Eddie Benjamin and DJ Tay James. Bieber has been posting glimpses from inside the studio on social media, most recently sharing a photo with his 10-month-old son Jack Blues Bieber. Last year, singer-songwriter Mk.gee stated in an interview that Bieber was working on his first record since 2021's "Justice." Bieber's representatives at his label, Def Jam, declinedVariety's request to comment further. "Swag" arrives after a musical hiatus from Bieber, who sold his catalog to Hipgnosis Songs Capital for north of $200 million in Jan. 2023. That same year, he split from his longtime manager Scooter Braun, who reportedly had financial issues with Bieber after giving him a loan to pay back concert promoter AEG for his canceled "Justice" tour. Check out the purported tracklist for "Swag" below: All I Can TakeDaisiesYukonGo BabyThings You DoButterfliesWay It IsFirst PlaceSoulfulWalking AwayGlory Voice MemoDevotionDadz LoveTherapy SessionSweet Spot405SwagZuma HouseToo LongForgiveness View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin Bieber (@lilbieber) Best of Variety Oscars 2026: George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Roberts, Wagner Moura and More Among Early Contenders to Watch New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Sign up forVariety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us onFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram.

Justin Bieber Reveals New Album Tracklist

Justin Bieber Reveals New Album Tracklist Justin Bieber has revealed the tracklist for what appears to be his seventh album "Swag,...
Families of passengers killed in January midair collision say Army isn't taking responsibility, according to new letterNew Foto - Families of passengers killed in January midair collision say Army isn't taking responsibility, according to new letter

The families of the victims of American Airlines Flight 5342 say they are "deeply dismayed" at the Army's recent actions regarding the ongoing investigation into the midair collision in January that killed 67 people near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. A new letter to the Secretary of the Army, signed by family members of the passengers who died when the regional jet and Black Hawk helicopter collided, called out the Army's refusal to engage with families, despite other parties involved in the accident being willing to cooperate. "The Army's approach contrasts sharply with the more collaborative stance taken by other organizations involved in this incident and raises serious questions about its commitment to transparency and accountability,"the letter read."Our concerns were compounded when the Army withheld its unclassified ADS-B policy memo from Congress, only releasing it under threat of subpoena." ADS-B is equipment installed in aircraft to detect and avoid potential collisions; however, in the January accident, the NTSB found it was not transmitting in the Army helicopter. The Army has been criticized by lawmakers following the incident, including both Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Sen. Ted Cruz and Ranking Member Maria Cantwell. In April, Cruz said,"If another Black Hawk helicopter strikes another passenger jet and murders 67 people because the Army refused to change its policy of turning off ADS-B Out and rather than act proactively to protect people's lives - the Army chose to protect its bureaucratic a** - those deaths will be on the Army's hands." The Army Inspector General later declined to open an independent audit into the crash, despite bipartisan support, as noted in the letter. "Given that this is the deadliest incident involving U.S. civilian casualties caused by the military in modern history, the Army has a heightened responsibility to ensure full public transparency and urgent implementation of meaningful safety reforms," the letter said. "The scale of this tragedy demands complete cooperation and accountability from all parties involved—including the U.S. Army." The families are requesting the Army appoint a family liaison, schedule a meeting with them and support the audits requested by Congress. CNN has reached out to the Pentagon for comment. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Families of passengers killed in January midair collision say Army isn’t taking responsibility, according to new letter

Families of passengers killed in January midair collision say Army isn't taking responsibility, according to new letter The families of ...
'I can't drink the water' - life next to a US data centreNew Foto - 'I can't drink the water' - life next to a US data centre

When Beverly Morris retired in 2016, she thought she had found her dream home - a peaceful stretch of rural Georgia, surrounded by trees and quiet. Today, it's anything but. Just 400 yards (366m) from her front porch in Mansfield, Georgia, sits a large, windowless building filled with servers, cables, and blinking lights. It's a data centre - one of many popping up across small-town America, and around the globe, to power everything from online banking to artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT. "I can't live in my home with half of my home functioning and no water," Ms Morris says. "I can't drink the water." She believes the construction of the centre, which is owned by Meta (the parent company of Facebook), disrupted her private well, causing an excessive build-up of sediment. Ms Morris now hauls water in buckets to flush her toilet. She says she had to fix the plumbing in her kitchen to restore water pressure. But the water that comes of the tap still has residue in it. "I'm afraid to drink the water, but I still cook with it, and brush my teeth with it," says Morris. "Am I worried about it? Yes." Meta, however, says the two aren't connected. In a statement to the BBC, Meta said that "being a good neighbour is a priority". The company commissioned an independent groundwater study to investigate Morris's concerns. According to the report, its data centre operation did "not adversely affect groundwater conditions in the area". While Meta disputes that it has caused the problems with Ms Morris' water, there's no doubt, in her estimation, that the company has worn out its welcome as her neighbour. "This was my perfect spot," she says. "But it isn't anymore." We tend to think of the cloud as something invisible - floating above us in the digital ether. But the reality is very physical. The cloud lives in over 10,000 data centres around the world, most of them located in the US, followed by the UK and Germany. With AI now driving a surge in online activity, that number is growing fast. And with them, more complaints from nearby residents. The US boom is being challenged by a rise in local activism - with $64bn (£47bn) in projectsdelayed or blocked nationwide,according to a report from pressure group Data Center Watch. And the concerns aren't just about construction. It's also about water usage. Keeping those servers cool requires a lot of water. "These are very hot processors," Mark Mills of the National Center for Energy Analytics testified before Congress back in April. "It takes a lot of water to cool them down." Many centres use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates - similar to how sweat wicks away heat from our bodies. On hot days, a single facility can use millions of gallons. One study estimates that AI-driven data centres could consume1.7 trillion gallonsof water globally by 2027. Business Daily: The impact of 'thirsty' data centres Few places illustrate this tension more clearly than Georgia - one of the fastest-growing data centre markets in the US. Its humid climate provides a natural and more cost-effective source of water for cooling data centres, making it attractive to developers. But that abundance may come at a cost. Gordon Rogers is the executive director of Flint Riverkeeper, a non-profit advocacy group that monitors the health of Georgia's Flint River. He takes us to a creek downhill from a new construction site for a data centre being built by US firm Quality Technology Services (QTS). George Dietz, a local volunteer, scoops up a sample of the water into a clear plastic bag. It's cloudy and brown. "It shouldn't be that colour," he says. To him, this suggests sediment runoff - and possibly flocculants. These are chemicals used in construction to bind soil and prevent erosion, but if they escape into the water system, they can create sludge. QTS says its data centres meet high environmental standards and bring millions in local tax revenue. While construction is often carried out by third-party contractors, local residents are the ones left to deal with the consequences. "They shouldn't be doing it," Mr Rogers says. "A larger wealthier property owner does not have more property rights than a smaller, less wealthy property owner." Tech giants say they are aware of the issues and are taking action. "Our goal is that by 2030, we'll be putting more water back into the watersheds and communities where we're operating data centres, than we're taking out," says Will Hewes, global water stewardship lead at Amazon Web Services (AWS), which runs more data centres than any other company globally. He says AWS is investing in projects like leak repairs, rainwater harvesting, and using treated wastewater for cooling. In Virginia, the company is working with farmers to reduce nutrient pollution in Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuary in the US. In South Africa and India - where AWS doesn't use water for cooling - the company is still investing in water access and quality initiatives. In the Americas, Mr Hewes says, water is only used on about 10% of the hottest days each year. Still, the numbers add up. A single AI query - for example, a request to ChatGPT - can use about as much water as a small bottle you'd buy from the corner shop. Multiply that by billions of queries a day, and the scale becomes clear. Prof Rajiv Garg teaches cloud computing at Emory University in Atlanta. He says these data centres aren't going away - if anything, they're becoming the backbone of modern life. "There's no turning back," Prof Garg says. But there is a path forward. The key, he argues, is long-term thinking: smarter cooling systems, rainwater harvesting, and more efficient infrastructure. In the short term, data centres will create "a huge strain", he admits. But the industry is starting to shift toward sustainability. And yet, that's little consolation to homeowners like Beverly Morris - stuck between yesterday's dream and tomorrow's infrastructure. Data centres have become more than just an industry trend - they're now part of national policy. President Donald Trump recently vowed to build the largest AI infrastructure project in history, calling it "a future powered by American data". Back in Georgia, the sun beats down through thick humidity - a reminder of why the state is so attractive to data centre developers. For locals, the future of tech is already here. And it's loud, thirsty, and sometimes hard to live next to. As AI grows, the challenge is clear: how to power tomorrow's digital world without draining the most basic resource of all - water. Correction: This article originally said that Beverly Morris lives in Fayette County, Georgia, and has been amended to explain that she lives in Mansfield, Georgia. Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day.Sign up here. How tariffs are shifting global supply chains Can shoes be made in the US without cheap labour? Why the world's superyachts are getting bigger and bigger The plans to put data centres in orbit and on the Moon

'I can't drink the water' - life next to a US data centre

'I can't drink the water' - life next to a US data centre When Beverly Morris retired in 2016, she thought she had found her dre...
Ye faces new allegations of sexual assault from former assistantNew Foto - Ye faces new allegations of sexual assault from former assistant

Yeis facing new allegations of sexual assault and sex trafficking from a former employee. Lauren Pisciotta, a former personal assistant for Ye who worked for him from 2021 to 2023, has filed a second amended complaint in her lawsuit against the rapperafter previously accusing himof sexual harassment and wrongful termination. The filing, which wasfirst reported by TMZ, accuses Ye of assault, battery, sex trafficking, stalking and false imprisonment, among other allegations. USA TODAY has reached out to representatives for Ye and Pisciotta for comment. A legal representative for Yepreviously told Rolling Stonethat Pisciotta was "terminated for being unqualified, demanding unreasonable sums of money (including a $4 million annual salary) and numerous documented incidents of her lascivious, unhinged conduct." The representative denied her "baseless" allegations and accused her of "blackmail and extortion." However, the latest filing says "Ye subjected Ms. Pisciotta to obscene comments about her body, demanded she wear tight fitting clothing, groped her on a regular basis, forced her to watch Ye perform sexual acts with other women, sent her sexually explicit pictures and demanded she do the same, and repeatedly demanded that she join his sexual encounters, which she refused." The complaint alleges that "on one occasion, Ye attempted to vaginally penetrate Ms. Pisciotta with his fingers," while on another, "he orally raped her without her consent." Ye accused of drugging,sexually assaulting ex-assistant at Diddy session The filing accuses Ye, formerly known asKanye West, of forcibly kissing Pisciotta on the mouth, forcibly touching her vagina, and forcibly grabbing her by the throat. He also allegedly "offered someone the opportunity to have sex with" her "in exchange for allowing Ye to have sex with" that person's significant other. Ye accused of 'pornographic' chokingon La Roux music video set by model in lawsuit The complaint additionally accuses Ye of sex trafficking, alleging that he made "fraudulent promises of career advancement" in exchange for her "acquiescence" to his sexual contact and used "force and coercion to obtain compliance with his sexual demands." In 2023, he fired her after "multiple failed attempts at coercing" her to engage in sexual acts, the filing says. Pisciotta's earlier filing alleged that Ye drugged and sexually assaulted her during a studio session that he cohosted withSean "Diddy" Combs. She also alleges Ye once forced his way into her hotel room and "attempted to forcefully thrust his naked body onto and penis into" her face and in another instance locked her in a room and masturbated. Pisciotta first sued Ye in 2024 for sexual harassment, wrongful termination and breach of contract, then amended her complaint later in the year with additional allegations. The latest filing claims that after she filed her original complaint, Ye hired an individual to "SWAT" her by sending emergency services to her under false pretenses. "Within approximately one week of filing her original summons and complaint in this action, Ms. Pisciotta was bombarded with unwanted, harassing, and alarming visits from law enforcement and government agencies who claimed to be investigating various reports, such as child abuse, and searched her home and personal effects," the filing says. Pisciotta's attorney, Lisa Bloom, said in a statement to USA TODAY that "every woman deserves a respectful workplace free of groping and sexual harassment," adding, "We look forward to aggressively litigating this case on behalf of our brave client, Lauren Piscotta." This story has been updated to include additional information. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Kanye West accused of sexual assault, trafficking by Lauren Pisciotta

Ye faces new allegations of sexual assault from former assistant

Ye faces new allegations of sexual assault from former assistant Yeis facing new allegations of sexual assault and sex trafficking from a fo...
Rick Springfield details effects of brain injury from 25 years agoNew Foto - Rick Springfield details effects of brain injury from 25 years ago

Rick Springfield, 75, is revealing new details about thebrain injury he sustainedmore than two decades ago. During a "TODAY" segment on Thursday, the Grammy-award winner said he recently learned he had lasting damage from a bad fall during a Las Vegas concert her performed 25 years ago. "I was doing the show in Vegas, and I fell actually 25 feet to a steel stage," Springfield said on "TODAY" during his first on-camera interview since breaking the news. During a midshow stunt, Springfield was meant to be suspended from a beam on a gravity-fed harness system, but "it wasn't tied off," the singer revealed. "I slammed (onto the stage), and then the beam hit me on the head and then my head hit the (stage) again." At the time, doctors thought he'd only broken his wrist. "They checked me out, and it seemed to be OK," he recalled. But following a recent full-body MRI scan, he learned he'd suffered a brain injury all those years ago. He admitted to feeling uneasy ahead of the scan, worried doctors would discover something serious. "That's a very scary thing, because could that thing come up that you've always worried about, you know?" While they did find brain damage and scarring, Springfield says it's being monitored, and "we're just watching it." In the end, the singer said it was worth knowing these details about his health despite his anxiety beforehand. His father was the kind of person who avoided investigating his health, and Springfield was reluctant to repeat history, he told People in March. "My dad died from not wanting to know," Springfield said. "He thought he had stomach cancer for years and never got it checked out. When he finally collapsed one day at home, they found out it was an ulcer that burst, and he died from the loss of blood. It could have been fixed if he had gotten it checked out." He went on: "That was a giant message to me: If you want to live long, you have to be prepared for some bad news now and then. I could find out I have terminal cancer tomorrow and be dead in a year, but I can only do all I can do." On "TODAY," Springfield, a soon-to-be grandfather, said that the injury hasn't affected him much, and he's preparing for atour thatbegins this month.

Rick Springfield details effects of brain injury from 25 years ago

Rick Springfield details effects of brain injury from 25 years ago Rick Springfield, 75, is revealing new details about thebrain injury he s...
Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court rulingNew Foto - Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court ruling

By Nate Raymond CONCORD, New Hampshire (Reuters) -A federal judge on Thursday has again barred President Donald Trump's administration from enforcing his executive order limiting birthright citizenship across the country after the U.S. Supreme Court restricted the ability of judges to block his policies using nationwide injunctions. U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante in Concord, New Hampshire, made the ruling after immigrant rights advocates implored him to grant class action status to a lawsuit they filed seeking to represent any babies whose citizenship status would be threatened by the implementation of Trump's directive. Laplante agreed the plaintiffs could proceed as a class, allowing him to issue a fresh judicial order blocking implementation of the Republican president's policy nationally. The question of whether to issue an injunction was "not a close call," he said, noting children could be deprived of U.S. citizenship if Trump's order took effect. "That's irreparable harm, citizenship alone," he said. "It is the greatest privilege that exists in the world." The judge said he would stay his ruling for seven days to allow the Trump administration to appeal and would issue a written decision by the end of the day. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Under the Supreme Court's decision, Trump's executive order had been set to take effect on July 27. The ACLU and others had filed the suit just hours after the Supreme Court on June 27 issued a 6-3 ruling, powered by its conservative majority, that narrowed three nationwide injunctions issued by judges in separate challenges to Trump's directive. The suit was filed on behalf of non-U.S. citizens living in the United States whose babies might be affected. CLASS ACTIONS Looking to seize upon an exception in the Supreme Court's ruling, the lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the decision allows judges to continue to block Trump policies on a nationwide basis in class action lawsuits. The three judges who issued nationwide injunctions found that Trump's directive likely violates citizenship language in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. The amendment states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." The Justice Department has argued that Trump's order conforms with the Constitution and has asked Laplante to find that the plaintiffs cannot sue as a class. The Supreme Court's ruling did not address the legal merits of Trump's order, which the Republican president issued as part of his hardline immigration agenda on his first day back in office in January. Trump's order directs federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. More than 150,000 newborns would be denied citizenship annually if it takes effect nationally, according to Democratic-led states and immigrant rights advocates who have challenged it. UNIVERSAL INJUNCTIONS The Supreme Court ordered lower courts to reconsider the scope of the three injunctions that had blocked Trump's order from being enforced anywhere in the country against anyone after finding judges lack the authority to issue so-called "universal injunctions" that cover people who are not parties to the lawsuit before the judge. Although the Trump administration hailed the ruling as a major victory, federal judges have continued to issue sweeping rulings blocking key parts of Trump's agenda found to be unlawful. Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote the decision for the court, made clear that it did not prevent plaintiffs from obtaining essentially the same type of relief as provided in a nationwide injunction by instead bringing class action lawsuits that seek to represent all similarly situated people, among other exceptions. Immigrant rights advocates launched two proposed class actions that same day, including the one before Laplante, who in a related case also concluded in February that Trump's order was likely unconstitutional. Laplante, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, ruled that Trump's order contradicted the 14th Amendment and a 1898 Supreme Court ruling interpreting it. In that case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court interpreted that amendment as recognizing the right to birthright citizenship regardless of the immigration status of a baby's parents. Laplante agreed at the time that an injunction was warranted, saying that "the denial of citizenship to the plaintiffs' members' children would render the children either undocumented noncitizens or stateless entirely." But Laplante limited the scope of his order to members of the three immigrant rights nonprofit organizations who pursued the case before him. Lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union on Thursday urged Laplante to go further by certifying a nationwide class of babies and their parents who would be affected by Trump's order, saying that absent a court order thousands of families nationally would be unprotected. Laplante noted during Thursday's hearing that he was the one judge who had not issued a nationwide injunction in his previous ruling on Trump's order. "It's a better process to narrow these decisions and not have judges create national policy," he said. "That said, the Supreme Court suggested a class action is a better option." Trump's administration countered that the three noncitizens parents and expectant parents seeking to serve as lead plaintiffs have immigration statuses that are too different to be able to pursue a single class action together and that an injunction at this time would "short circuit" the usual lengthier process required for them to obtain relief. (Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Will Dunham and Deepa Babington)

Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court ruling

Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court ruling By Nate Raymond CONCORD, New Hampshire (Reuters) -A federal...

 

MARIO MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com