US judge tosses Buffalo Wild Wings lawsuit that has 'no meat on its bones'

New Photo - US judge tosses Buffalo Wild Wings lawsuit that has 'no meat on its bones'

US judge tosses Buffalo Wild Wings lawsuit that has 'no meat on its bones' ReutersFebruary 18, 2026 at 3:56 AM 0 A pedestrian walks past a Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant in New York, U.S., February 6, 2017. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson NEW YORK, Feb 17 (Reuters) A U.S. federal judge threw out on Tuesday a lawsuit against BuffaloWild Wings that alleged the restaurant and sports ‌bar chain deceived consumers by selling boneless wings that are not ​actually deboned chicken wings. Judge John Tharp Jr.

- - US judge tosses Buffalo Wild Wings lawsuit that has 'no meat on its bones'

ReutersFebruary 18, 2026 at 3:56 AM

0

A pedestrian walks past a Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant in New York, U.S., February 6, 2017. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK, Feb 17 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge threw out on Tuesday a lawsuit against Buffalo ‌Wild Wings that alleged the restaurant and sports ‌bar chain deceived consumers by selling boneless wings that are not ​actually de-boned chicken wings.

Judge John Tharp Jr. in Chicago dismissed the proposed class action lawsuit brought in 2023 by a man named Aimen Halim who claimed he was misled ‌into purchasing the disputed ⁠menu item that is essentially a chicken nugget.

"Halim sued (Buffalo Wild Wings) over his confusion, but ⁠his complaint has no meat on its bones," Tharp wrote in his ruling.

"Despite his best efforts, Halim did not 'drum' ​up enough ​factual allegations to state ​a claim," the judge ‌added.

Halim alleged that the marketing and advertising of "boneless wings" is false, duping consumers in violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, among other claims.

Tharp said reasonable consumers are not deceived into thinking boneless wings ‌are truly made of wing meat. "If ​Halim is right, reasonable consumers ​should think that cauliflower ​wings are made (at least in part) from ‌wing meat. They don't, though," ​the judge added.

Despite ​granting the chain's request to dismiss the case, Tharp gave Halim until March 20 to amend his ​lawsuit to present ‌any additional facts that would allow the case ​to go ahead.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New ​York; Editing by Saad Sayeed)

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Money"

Read More


Source: Money

Published: February 18, 2026 at 05:18AM on Source: MARIO MAG

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

 

MARIO MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com